Assessment of the safety and efficacy of the Zoom 45 and 55 reperfusion catheters for medium and distal mechanical thrombectomies: A multi-institutional study.

INTRODUCTION: The Zoom aspiration catheters harbor novel dimensions and construction to enhance trackability and deliverability. In addition, a beveled tip may improve thrombus interaction and aspiration force for a set inner diameter. This study evaluates their utility in medium and distal vessel occlusions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Zoom 45 and 55 aspiration catheters in medium and distal vessel thrombectomy. METHODS: Patients treated for distal vessel occlusions via mechanical thrombectomy utilizing either the Zoom 45/55 catheter or a historical control catheter between 2021-2022 at two institutions were included in this study. Medium and distal occlusions were defined as any anterior or posterior cerebral artery branch as well as the M2-4 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Preprocedural, procedural, and postprocedural variables were obtained. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent thrombectomy with Zoom 45 or 55 catheters; four had multiple occluded vessels. Occlusion location included the M2 in 32 cases, M3-4 in 7 cases, A2 in 2 cases and P2 in 1 case. The mean number of passes per occlusion was 1.6 and overall successful reperfusion (TICI 2b or greater) was achieved in 84 % of cases. There were no symptomatic procedure-related complications such as perforation or post-procedural symptomatic ICH. Modified Rankin scores rates of 0-2, 3-5, and 6 at three months post-procedure were 35.7 %, 21.4 %, and 42.9 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Zoom beveled tip aspiration catheters are safe and effective for more challenging medium and distal vessel occlusions.

Endoscopic endonasal decompression of the optic nerve in the setting of compressive lesions: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Many lesions in the anterior skull base may compress the optic nerve (ON), leading to vision loss, and even irreversible blindness. Although decompression of the optic nerve has traditionally been achieved transcranially, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is gaining traction as a minimally invasive approach recently. METHOD: We describe the key steps of an EEA ON decompression. The relevant surgical anatomy with illustration is described. Additionally, a video detailing our technique and instruments on an illustrative case is provided. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic endonasal approach ON decompression with a straight feather blade is a feasible, minimally invasive procedure to decompress the ON in the setting of anterior skull base mass lesions.

A novel technique for decortication of the lumbar facet joints for posterolateral fusion with percutaneous exposure: A cadaveric feasibility study.

Background: Percutaneous approaches to the spine have been explored recently for various procedures, including transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. It is known that facet decortication leads to higher rates of fusion, but effective percutaneous approaches have not been well documented. There are a set of instruments used in the cervical spine for percutaneous decortication, the CORUS™ Spinal System-X (DI# 00852776006508), which may be useful in this setting. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of decorticating the lumbar facet joints with these instruments in cadavers to aid in minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Methods: We performed percutaneous facet joint decortication at each facet joint in the lumbar spine in two adult cadavers. We tested varying degrees of laterality for entry points and angulation for access at each level to optimize the innovative procedure. Results: When using the CORUS™ Spinal System-X to obtain percutaneous access for facet decortication in the lumbar spine, we successfully dissected down to the facet joint without neurovascular injury. At the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels, access was best obtained at 4 cm from midline with an angulation of 10°. At the L3-L4 and L4-L5 level, access was best obtained at 4 cm from midline with an angulation of 20°. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that percutaneous lumbar facet joint decortication is feasible with the CORUS™ Spinal System-X instruments, and warrants further, comparative study in the clinical setting.

CT guided biopsy for osteodiscitis reduces cost of hospitalization in the landscape of increasing intravenous drug use: A single center retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Osteodiscitis has been demonstrated to show significant morbidity and mortality. Cultures and CT guided biopsy (CTB) are commonly used diagnosis of osteodiscitis. This study's purpose is to evaluate the cost burden of CTB and to evaluate how IVDU affects patient management in the setting of osteodiscitis. METHODS: Patients admitted for osteodiscitis from 2011-2021 were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into cohorts by CTB status. Additional cohorts were stratified by Intravenous Drug Use (IVDU). Patient demographics, total cost of hospitalization, length of hospitalization, time to biopsy, IVDU status, and other factors were recorded. T-Test, Chi-squared analysis, and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Total cost of hospitalization was recorded for 140 patients without CTB and 346 patients with CTB. Average cost of hospitalization for non-CTB was $227,317.86 compared to CTB at $119,799.20 (p < 0.001). Length of stay (LOS) was found to be 18.01 days for non-CTB and 14.07 days for CTB patients (0.00282). When stratified by days until biopsy, patients who had CTB sooner, had significantly reduced cost of hospitalization (p = 0.0003). Patients with IVDU history were significantly younger (p < 0.001) with lower BMI (p < 0.001) and a significantly different clinical profile. There was a significant difference in positive open biopsy when separated by IVDU status (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: CTB was associated with significantly reduced cost of hospitalization and LOS compared to non-CTB. IVDU patients with osteodiscitis have significantly different clinical profiles than non-IVDU that may impact diagnosis and treatment. Further work is indicated to elucidate causes of these differences to provide high value care to patients with osteodiscitis.

Impact of obesity on adult spinal deformity (ASD) long-segment spinal fusion radiographic and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients receiving long-segment fusion during a five-year period. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether obese patients receive comparable benefits when receiving long-segment fusion compared to non-obese patients and to identify factors that may predict hardware failure and post-surgical complications among obese patients. METHODS: Demographic, spinopelvic radiographic, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications data was retrospectively collected from 120 patients who underwent long-segment fusion during a five-year period at one tertiary care medical center. Radiographic measurements were pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, PI-LL mismatch, and proximal junction cobb angle at upper instrumented vertebrae + 2 (UIV+2). PROMs were Oswestry disability index, numeric rating scale (NRS) Back Pain, NRS Leg Pain, RAND SF-36 pain, and RAND SF-36 physical functioning. Included patients were adults and had at least 2-years of postoperative follow-up. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analysis was performed with α = 0.05. RESULTS: Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 (n=63) and patients with a BMI < 30 (n=57) demonstrated comparable improvements (P>0.05) for all spinopelvic radiographic measurements and PROMs. Each cohort demonstrated significant improvements from pre-assessment to post-assessment on nearly all spinopelvic radiographic measurements and PROMs (P<0.05), except PT and L4-S1 lordosis where neither group improved (p=0.95 and 0.58 for PT and P=0.23 and 0.11 for L4-S1 lordosis fornon-obese and obese cohorts respectively) and SF-36 physical functioning where the non-obese cohort not statistically improve (P=0.08). Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 demonstrated an increased incidence of cardiovascular complications (P=0.0293), acute kidney injury (P=0.0241), rod fractures (P=0.0293), and reoperations (P=0.0241) when compared to patients with a BMI < 30. CONCLUSION: This study adds to a growing body of evidence linking demographic factors with risks of hardware failure. Further, this data challenges the assumption that obese patients may not receive sufficient benefit to be long-segment surgical candidates. However, given their elevated risk for post-operative and delayed hardware complications, obese patients should be appropriately counseling before undergoing surgery.

Use of global sagittal flexibility to predict proximal junctional kyphosis after spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Sagittal alignment is an important predictor of functional outcomes after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). A rigid spinal column may create a large lever arm that may impact the rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after ASD surgery. In this study, the authors sought to determine whether relatively low preoperative global spinal flexibility (i.e., rigid spine) predicts increased incidence of PJK at 1 year after ASD surgery. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed long-segment thoracolumbar fusions with pelvic fixation performed at a single tertiary care center between October 2015 and September 2020 in patients with a minimum of 1-year radiographic and clinical follow-up. Two cohorts were established on the basis of the optimal value for spinal flexibility, as defined by the absolute difference between the preoperative standing and supine C7 sagittal vertical axes, which the authors termed global sagittal flexibility (GSF). Demographic information, radiographs, various associated complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using GSF to predict an increase in the proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle (PJCA) greater than or equal to 10° at 1-year follow-up provided an area under the curve of 0.64 and identified an optimal GSF threshold value of 3.7 cm. Patients with GSF > 3.7 cm were considered globally flexible (48 patients), and those with GSF ≤ 3.7 cm were classified as rigid (37 patients). Rigid patients were noted to have a significantly higher risk of ΔPJCA ≥ 10° at 1-year follow-up (51.4% vs 29.3%, p = 0.049). No changes in the reoperation rates or PROMs based on GSF were observed in the 1- or 2-year postoperative window. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these retrospective data, preoperative global spinal rigidity portends an independently elevated risk for the development of PJK after ASD surgery. No differences in other complication rates or PROMs data were observed between groups. Data collection was limited to a 2-year postoperative window; therefore, longer follow-up is required to further elucidate the relationship between rigidity and reoperation rates. Based on these retrospective data, flexibility may influence the outcomes of patients with ASD.

Electronic versus paper patient-reported outcome measure compliance rates: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are key tools used to inform clinical research and patient-centered care. Application of data collected from PROMs, however, may be limited by incomplete responses, and little is known regarding the efficacy of varied PROM delivery methods. The objective of this study was to compare PROMs compliance when delivered via paper and electronic formats. METHODS: Elective adult spinal deformity patients were screened for inclusion. Data collected included demographics, type of surgery, PROMs compliance, and discharge care. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed to compare pre- and postoperative compliance rates. RESULTS: Of the 474 included patients, 177 were administered paper PROMs, while 297 were electronic. Preoperatively, 101 patients (57.1%) had any portion of their paper PROMs available; 179 (60.3%) had any of their electronic PROMs available (p = 0.492). Among all patients, 76 (42.9%) and 170 (57.2%) had all of their completed preop PROMs available (p = 0.003). Among patients with any of their preop PROMs completed, 75.2% with paper and 95.0% with electronic were completed in their entirety (p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed among postoperative PROMs. MVA demonstrated electronic delivery as the only significant correlate with pre- and post-operative PROMs compliance (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed across modalities when considering any available PROMs, yet electronic PROM delivery was associated with higher completion of PROMs. In order to improve the quality of patient-reported data, electronic delivery with alternative methods of quality improvement may be considered to increase PROMs retention rates.

Subsidence Rates Associated With Porous 3D-Printed Versus Solid Titanium Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 3D-printed porous titanium (3DPT) interbody cages offer any clinical or radiographic advantage over standard solid titanium (ST) interbody cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). METHODS: A consecutive series of adult patients undergoing one- or two-level TLIF with either 3DPT or ST "banana" cages were analyzed for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic complications, and clinical complications. Exclusion criteria included clinical or radiographic follow-up less than 1 year. RESULTS: The final cohort included 90 ST interbody levels from 74 patients, and 73 3DPT interbody levels from 50 patients for a total of 124 patients. Baseline demographic variables and comorbidity rates were similar between groups (P > .05). Subsidence of any grade occurred more frequently in the ST group compared with the 3DPT group (24.4% vs 5.5%, respectively, P = .001). Further, the ST group was more likely to have higher grades of subsidence than the 3DPT group (P = .009). All PROMs improved similarly after surgery and revision rates did not differ between groups (both P > .05). On multivariate analysis, significant positive correlators with increasing subsidence grade included greater age (P = .015), greater body mass index (P = .043), osteoporosis/osteopenia (P < .027), and ST cage type (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: When considering interbody material for TLIF, both ST and 3DPT cages performed well; however, 3DPT cages were associated with lower rates of subsidence. The clinical relevance of these findings deserves further randomized, prospective investigation.

Early Postural Stability Changes in Patients Undergoing Correction of Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Controlled Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition often requiring surgical intervention. Improved outcomes among ASD patients have been shown to correlate with postoperative spinopelvic parameters, yet little is currently known about the role of postural stability and balance assessment for ASD patients. PURPOSE: Explore early changes in postural stability following ASD correction. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixteen adult patients who underwent four-level or greater posterolateral fusion to address global spinal malalignment and 14 healthy controls with no known spinal deformity nor surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Postural stability parameters, spinopelvic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. METHODS: Force plate balance assessment was completed where participants and healthy controls were instructed to stand with their hands at their sides, standing still, with eyes open. Center of pressure (COP), center of gravity (COG), and cone of economy (COE) parameters were analyzed with paired and unpaired t tests with an alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: Preoperatively, ASD patients demonstrated more COG (P=0.0244) and sagittal and coronal head (P<0.05) sway than healthy controls. Postoperatively, ASD patients exhibited less COP (P=0.0308), COG (P=0.0276) and head (P=0.0345) sway. Compared to healthy controls, ASD patients postoperatively exhibited similar postural stability, aside from COP and COG sway amplitudes (P<0.05), and coronal head sway (P=0.0309). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis improved from 16.2° to 4.8° (P<0.01) and 82.2 to 22.5 mm (P<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: We report a novel early improvement in postural stability, comparable to healthy controls, following ASD correction that may be related to improved spinopelvic alignment. Force plate evaluation may be a useful tool for ASD patients postoperatively. Future clinical trials assessing the impact of postural stability on clinical and radiographic outcomes are warranted.

Endoscopic endonasal resection of craniovertebral junction osteomyelitis: illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND: Operative management of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) osteomyelitis has traditionally been extracranial and focused on debriding the infection. In select patients, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) with a focus on additional resection versus debridement may be preferred. The goal of this study is to present the authors' experience with the EEA with gross or subtotal resection for the treatment of osteomyelitis at the CVJ and describe their technique in the context of the literature. OBSERVATIONS: Two patients of the authors' and 6 detailed case reports in the literature were identified with a mean age of 58.9 years. Most patients (n = 5; 62.5%) underwent skull base surgery and debridement (n = 5; 62.5%). Although more common, debridement was inferior to resection in terms of neurological improvement (66.7% vs. 100.0%) postoperatively. The majority (n = 7; 87.5%) of patients underwent occipitocervical fusion. LESSONS: Osteomyelitis is an exceedingly rare lesion of the CVJ. Despite the region's delicate biomechanical stability, resection of infected bone may be superior to debridement alone in terms of clinical outcome. Given how well established the safety of the EEA is to this region, further study of outcomes with resection is warranted.

Static Cage Morphology in Short-Segment Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions Is Associated With Alterations in Foraminal Height But Not Clinical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Steerable "banana" cages have been posited to increase segmental lordosis in short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). The same is not necessarily true for straight "bullet" cages. Although increased lordosis is generally thought to be advantageous, a potential complication is decreased foraminal height. Here we evaluate for any association between cage type and change in foraminal height and clinical outcomes following short-segment TLIFs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 1- and 2-level TLIFs with bilateral facetectomies with minimum 1-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Two cohorts were based on cage morphology: steerable "banana" cage or straight "bullet" cage. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic measurements, and revision rates were compared. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with 53 straight and 95 patients with 131 steerable cage levels were included. Steerable cages showed increased segmental lordosis (9.1° vs. 13.5°, P < 0.001) and decreased foraminal height (20.3 vs. 18.5 mm, P < 0.001) after surgery. Straight cages demonstrated similar segmental lordosis (8.7° vs 8.1°, P = 0.30) and foraminal height (19.4 vs 20.0 mm, P < 0.065). Both cohorts showed improved PROMs at last follow-up (P ≤ 0.005). Subanalysis comparing patients who had increased or decreased foraminal height revealed similarly improved PROMs between cohorts. Revision rates at 1 year were similar between cohorts (4.3% for straight and 3.2% for steerable group, P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Although the increased segmental lordosis afforded by placement of steerable cages may decrease foraminal height after short segment TLIF, clinical outcomes are not negatively affected by this association.